We are an immediate loan specialist in Jefferson, and we are quicker and more advantageous than run of the mill retail facade banks since we're based on the web and are open constantly. No compelling reason to sit tight for "ordinary business hours" or invest energy flying out to the store — our short application can be finished in not more than minutes. You can even apply from a cell phone while you're in a hurry!
We can loan up to $500 to Jefferson occupants, in view of qualifying elements. On the off chance that endorsed, your credit will be expected on your next payday that falls in the vicinity of 10 and 31 days after you get your advance. Nitty gritty data with respect to expenses and reimbursement is accessible on our Rates and Terms page. As you consider whether an advance is proper for your prompt needs, you ought to likewise investigate other subsidizing alternatives. A payday credit is a genuine budgetary duty, and not an answer for long haul issues. Getting from a companion of relative may be a superior alternative.
This question is not meant to be a very specific and serious question. Given 2 applicants Applicant number 1 Rich- which means he doesn't need assistance from Harvard/Yale (not a single cent of assistance) Let say we tabulated his SATC'S AND GPA AND pennsylvania A RATING OUT OF 100% HE GOT 96% Extra-curricular and Community Service- 9/10 in rating Applicant number 2 Poor- which means he will be needing assistance (let's say his dad is a carpenter and his mom is a home-maker) Same thing with him with the SAT"s and GPA rating, but he got 98% Extra-curricular 9/10 also let's say we're only looking at these factors nothing else in consideration, who's more appealing? Say #1- he's very good, and rich , the school won't have any problem regarding money with him, but #2's better than him in the total academics, however #2's got a very difficult financial situation which might be the school's problem eventually So any opinion? (Remember we are only considering those factors)
Harvard admissions are need-blind. They don't take whether or not you can pay into account. One way or another, you will have to pay - scholarships, loans, personal money, etc - they'll get the money. If you get in and don't want to take out the loans, someone else will be happy to take your place and do so. So they'd probably go with #2, but then they turn down plenty of perfect GPAs and SAT scores each year. The two applicants need to find some way to stand out if they want a better shot at Harvard.
I work at both UC Berkeley and UCLA as the acceptance head of board. I control who gets in, and who doesn't. They would both probably get in. And yeah, they will get the money either through loan or scholarship.
2. those schools like yale and harvard are "need-blind" which means they dont look at your financial situation, at all. They will gladly pay for whatever you need as long as you actually need it.
Yale MIT U.C. Berkeley All have Free, open courses for world to see, anytime, anywhere. colleges will be web-based or obsolete in 10-years.